21 storeys approved in York road paves the way for more towers even before consultation for the area

Author: Cyril Richert

By 5 votes to 2 (you can guess who voted against) the scheme 2015/0881, including a 21 storey tower, was approved at the Planning application Committee meeting on the 14th July.

21 storeys approved in York road paves the way for more towers even before consultation for the area

Proposed development for 198 York Road (currently Homebase)

More than 40 objections were received, noting that none of the buildings along York Road are over 6 storeys, yet the shortest proposed building
is 9 storeys.

We also wrote an article showing that, as usual, Wandsworth planning policy (SSAD page 234) was ignored.

All issues and breach of policies have been brushed off with the benefits of the venue provided for the Royal Academy of Dance (currently located in Battersea Square). In what looks like a copy-cat of the developer’s advertising brochure, the officers’ report says : “The RAD as an occupier would undoubtedly add lustre to the area and could provide the centrepiece for a new cultural district attracting visitors and further investment to this part of the borough“.

The level of affordable accommodation proposed reaches 20% (raised from 10% in the initial proposal), well bellow the borough’s policy of 40% (but you know, the RAD…etc). All commercial uses of the scheme and the public realm routes through the site have also been removed.

In a very cynical circumstance, the Council is currently (until 9th August) also consulting Wandsworth residents on the possible designation of Lombard/York Road area as a focal point (which should consequently allow taller building).

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road 21 storeys approved in York road paves the way for more towers even before consultation for the area

Our support for Crossrail 2 station on Grant road

Author: Cyril Richert

Our support for Crossrail 2 station on Grant road

On Wednesday 22nd July was organised a meeting to discuss a new community engagement panel TfL is proposing to establish in the Clapham Junction area.

As they work to refine the proposals for Crossrail 2, which includes a new station at Clapham Junction, they want to engage with representatives of the community panel, to provide more information about proposals for Crossrail 2,  to better understand local issues and what this means for our community.

Later this year a wider public consultation on the scheme will be organised.

Transport for London and Network Rail are working together to plan Crossrail 2, and the current Crossrail 2 route proposes a station at Clapham Junction. A Crossrail 2 station at Clapham Junction would create a new interchange to London Overground and National Rail services and create additional capacity and relieve crowding at Waterloo.

However their plan for safeguarding part of Grant Road and Bramlands area is deeply upsetting Wandsworth Council‘s plans to use that are for high rise towers in order to decant the population for their redevelopment projects of Winstanley and York Road estates.

We have submitted the following statement in support of Crossrail 2 ambition:

We support a redevelopment of Clapham Junction station
1. We are fully supporting your aim to redevelop some areas of Clapham Junction station to welcome Crossrail 2 (as shown in the map published to protect the proposed route ).
2. We have long advocated for a master plan to redevelop Clapham Junction station and we believe that you address here the needs for a proper and ambitious plan for a station redevelopment.

Wandsworth Council is not giving enough consideration to transport issues
3. Wandsworth Council has submitted a response to the consultation in February 2015 and expressed strong concerns that Crossrail 2 safeguarding is jeopardizing their master plan for the improvement of the Winstanley and York Road Estates and immediate surrounding area.
4. They wrote in their representation that “The Masterplan has involved extensive consultation with the local community and an iterative process has led to a preferred option […] The Council has now carried out the necessary scheme testing, with local residents [and] the view was expressed that Bramlands would be used to drive and change values across the whole site.” We would like you to know that this is misleading as at NO TIME has the local area being consulted on the developments of Grant Road/Bramlands specifically, and the public has never been offered any option but a fait-accompli. The view that Bramland could be used for dense and tall buildings is the sole view of Wandsworth Council with no consultation on the matter. Actually an initial consultation demanded for “fewer towers” in the whole area.
5. In addition, the current area formed along York road, from Lombard road to the Winstanley/York area and up to Wandsworth roundabout, is under intense pressure for redevelopment. While the local policies are all suggesting that building taller than 4 or 8 storeys in the location are “likely to be inappropriate” , a number of redevelopment proposals have already emerged to replace mostly industrial or retail sites with high density residential developments. For the purpose of giving examples we can cite (non-exhaustive list):
• Several buildings up to 21 storeys recommended for approval at 198 York Road (replacing a retail warehouse building by 254 residential units),
• several buildings up to 17 storeys recommended for approval at 98 York Road (replacing a car retail by 192 residential units),
• several buildings up to 30 storeys for screening opinion at York Road (replacing a warehouse building and car park by approximatively 200 residential units),
• a 14 storey building approved at 12 – 14 Lombard Road (replacing two-storey commercial building by 33 residential flats),
• a 28 storey building approved at 56 – 66 Gwynne Road (erecting 135 residential units on a currently disused site),
• Winstanley/York redevelopment plans (potentially demolishing 700 homes and replacing them with around 2,000 units – increase of 1400 residential units – across the regeneration scheme)
6. We have joined our voice to the concerns expressed by the Battersea Society and called for a halt to any further planning permissions until there has been serious consideration, with TfL, of the implications of the increased demand on road and public transport in the area.
7. We are concerned that Wandsworth Council is currently pushing for major developments in an area where public transport capacity is already inadequate at peak periods and increasingly at other times.
8. They are not giving proper consideration for their own Policy DMT1 where it says that “Development […] will be permitted where it does not have a negative impact on the transport system”. In addition, the NPPF suggests that developments shouldn’t have a significant impact on transport system.

We support the plan to locate a Crossrail 2 station at the safeguarded site (Grant Road)
9. We welcome the plans for a Crossrail 2 station at Clapham Junction as it is currently safeguarded. The proposed location at Grant Road will create a properly integrated interchange to London Overground and National Rail services and give the proper recognition for Clapham Junction station as a major transport hub in south London.
10. Plans should not be derailed by the Council’s consideration to only maximise residential development potential and their identification of Grant Road/Bramlands as ideal site for decanting the current population during the construction project.
11. Alternative sites by the Council (the land to the rear of Clapham Junction Station and the Asda/Lidl site) would not provide the same integration possibilities and seem to be suggested without the interest of Clapham Junction transport expansion at heart, despite Wandsworth Council’s claim.

We wish to be included to any discussion and consultation regarding the possibilities of station redevelopment and the impact of Crossrail 2 and would like to be included in the community panel.

Filed under: The station, Winstanley&York Road Our support for Crossrail 2 station on Grant road

Winstanley redevelopment at odds with CrossRail 2 plans

Author: Cyril Richert

With the recent publishing of the safeguarded route for the Crossrail 2 lines, Wandsworth Council finds himself at odds with its plans to construct a cluster of tall building on Grant Road/Bramlands Close: this is actually the site reserved by Network Rail to implement the Cross Rail entrance at Clapham Junction.

Winstanley redevelopment at odds with CrossRail 2 plans

Blue Areas: These are areas where the Crossrail 2 proposals have a greater effect at ground level, such as for stations, temporary worksites or ventilation and emergency shafts.

John Stone (Head of Forward Planning and Transportation, Wandsworth Council) submitted a response to the consultation in February 2015 and wrote:

The larger Bramlands site is predominantly owned by the Council although there are a number of other ownerships including Network Rail. There are current proposals for the redevelopment of this site as part of the Council’s master plan for the improvement of the Winstanley and York Road Estates and immediate surrounding area. It is also part of an application for Housing Zone status, which is being considered by the Greater London Authority that is intended to accelerate housing development with this being a key site in viability terms. Proposals for this area include the relocation of the bus stand and the construction of a mixed use development including tall buildings in excess of 9 storeys. Network Rail also has proposals for improving and reletting the railway arches to the south of Grant Road. The Council is concerned that once the safeguarding is issued, TfL would not allow these proposed developments to proceed.

Over the past 18 months, the Council has worked up a Masterplan for the development at Winstanley & York Road Estates. The Masterplan has involved extensive consultation with the local community and an iterative process has led to a preferred option that is both viable and attractive to the market, while ensuring the aims and objectives of the Council are met. As part of the development, the Council has committed to re-providing c. 640 affordable homes under a “one move only” policy.

This process poses substantial funding demands which mean it is essential to enable profitable phases to be brought forward alongside the decant requirement to enable cross subsidy and manage cash-flow. The Council has now carried out the necessary scheme testing, both with local residents and through soft market testing with potential delivery partners, prior to commencing the process of procuring a private sector partner. In the soft market testing undertaken for this development larger developers were particularly interested in the possibilities offered by Bramlands and this added significantly to the attraction of the scheme as a whole. The view was expressed that Bramlands would be used to drive and change values across the whole site. There was further interest in potentially expanding the new housing into other areas, for example the Falcons Estate which would only occur if the Bramlands area was transformed first.

Development of this site is a crucial element of the overall Winstanley and York Road regeneration proposals and the viability of the overall scheme is entirely dependent on the early development of this key site. The Bramlands area has the potential to generate the highest residential values of the whole scheme and the location of Bramlands directly adjacent to Clapham Junction station enables development here to be undertaken at substantially higher densities then elsewhere in the scheme. Consequently it is estimated that 300 plus units could be provided at this location and is a necessary component to enable delivery of the 2,000 + units across the regeneration scheme as well as providing new commercial and cultural facilities which will serve and improve the whole area.

There is a further equally important impact in that transformation of Bramlands is considered to be key to securing the step change in the neighbourhood as a whole and as a consequence crucial to achieving increased viability across the Housing Zone as a whole. Bramlands is at the entrance to the neighbourhood and without change here it will be harder and more problematic to draw higher values across from the south of the railway. It is estimated that this will reduce end values by approximately 15% across the remainder of the scheme.

The Council would like to gain a better understanding of the rationale behind choosing Bramlands as the appropriate land for Safeguarding. The Housing Zone work undertaken to date has identified two alternative sites directly adjacent to the railway line namely the land to the rear of Clapham Junction Station and the Asda/Lidl site. Both these sites contain operational assets and have been considered unlikely to come forward for housing or further development in the short to medium term. As such, these sites may not be encumbered in the immediate sense to safeguarding measures over the coming 10 years. Therefore, it seems these sites provide a potential alternative to the safeguarding of Bramlands, which would ensure housing can come forward at York Road & Winstanley Estates in the short to medium term, meeting the objectives not only of the Housing Zone and the Council, but the aim of Crossrail overall to unlock delivery and service additional housing need.

The Council has had ongoing discussions with Network Rail in regard to their plans both for the refurbishment of the arches on Grant Road but most importantly the expansion of Clapham Junction Station. The Council would like to better understand the connectivity between the wider Network Rail masterplanning/options analysis and the scheduled work streams to progress with the Crossrail 2 plans.

The Council sees a clear need for a joint vision between the Network Rail expansion plans, Crossrail 2 and the bringing forward of housing and regeneration within the proposed Housing Zone. We propose a plan for the area is developed together, ensuring that the optimal proposals both from a transport, housing and overall regeneration perspective are put forward. The varying timescales for delivery of the components make swift collaboration ever more important.

The Council has proposed to form a steering group with the appropriate attendees from all key stakeholders to work up this joint vision in a timeframe that does not pose undue delays to the delivery of housing on Winstanley & York Road Estates or across the proposed Housing Zone as a whole.

Due to the significant and terminal impact that safeguarding of this land as a worksite could have on the long standing regeneration proposals for the whole area and the impact on the provision of substantial amounts of new housing within a Housing Zone, the Council objects in the strongest possible terms to this designation given the clear risks posed to the delivery of housing, regeneration and improvement.

If alternative land is deemed unsuitable, there may be a need to use some of Bramlands for the provision of infrastructure for a new station and a dialogue should be undertaken as soon as possible with TfL and other key stakeholders to identify the infrastructure requirements and assess the potential to plan the new development to allow for this either to be implemented in advance or retrospectively at the point of delivery of Crossrail 2/ overall expansion of Clapham Junction.

Failure to provide certainty on the delivery potential at Bramlands could result insubstantial delays to housing delivery. As such, the Council asks that Barmlands is prioritised such that the impact of safeguarding can be explored jointly over the next 6 months.

Independently of the consideration of the Grand Road/Bramlands site being available for high rise development as intended in plans, we would like Wandsworth Council to stop stating that “The Masterplan has involved extensive consultation with the local community and an iterative process has led to a preferred option […] The Council has now carried out the necessary scheme testing, with local residents [and] the view was expressed that Bramlands would be used to drive and change values across the whole site.This is misleading at least as at NO TIME has the local area being consulted on the developments of Grant Road/Bramlands, and the public has never been offered any option but a fait-accompli! The view that Bramland could be used for dense and tall buildings is the sole view of Wandsworth Council with NO CONSULTATION.

We would appreciate Wandsworth Council to stop spreading misleading information and for once organise a honest consultation on the basis of a real choice of options for the area, including Grant Road and Bramlands.

The Department for Transport is still safeguarding Grant Road

On March 24th, the government updated plans to protect the proposed route for Crossrail 2 from conflicting development. The updated safeguarded route published extends from Wimbledon in the south-west to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate in the north-east. Under the new Crossrail 2 safeguarding directions, relevant planning applications in safeguarded areas will be referred to TfL for advice. If development interferes with Crossrail 2, either a compromise will be reached or the development will not be allowed.

Following a 10-week consultation (between 20 November 2014 and 29 January 2015), the government and TfL have made some modifications to the proposed safeguarded route, including at Wandsworth Common (to avoid digging a shaft inside the Common land).

While the majority of comments received were opposing the area of surface interest (AOSI) sites on Wandsworth Common and Trinity Fields in Wandsworth (3,728 responses), which explains also that 80% of the total responses (4,038) came from Wandsworth: respondents stressed the importance of these green spaces in their community, it is noticeable that only 1 response expressed concerns regarding Grant Road: the above submission from Wandsworth Council. It speaks for itself on the level of involvement from the local resident, especially when you think than more than 3000 responses were received for other areas in the borough.

Based on the comments made in the consultation, and TfL’s changes to the proposed route, the Secretary of State has decided not to amend the option to safeguard the site at Grant Road/Bramlands for Crossrail2 access to Clapham Junction station.

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Winstanley redevelopment at odds with CrossRail 2 plans

Be prepared for a cluster of “Falcon Towers” at Clapham Junction

Authors: Mike Snaith & Cyril Richert

Be prepared for a cluster of “Falcon Towers” at Clapham Junction

Clapham Junction near Falcon Road

On the evidence of latest exhibition at York Library on the Winstanley/York regeneration plans, it is obvious that not only have our previous concerns and comments been completely ignored by Wandsworth Council, but also those of the regeneration area’s residents, who specifically wanted “fewer towers”.

To be fair, the smallest of the three existing council block towers is to be demolished. But a panel in the exhibition clearly shows two NEW tower blocks just beyond the railway bridge at the top of Falcon Road and adjoining Grant Road, on the so-called Bramlands site.

Be prepared for a cluster of “Falcon Towers” at Clapham Junction

Cluster of towers near CJ railway bridge (the two blue-white Falcon’s Towers on this picture exist already)

On November 27 2013 the council’s team in charge of the project replied to our inquiry on the plans:

“The options currently being consulted on are at a masterplan options stage only. So the plans and drawings that are shown are concepts and indicative only of how development could be pursued. The options signify that the master planners consider that development to a higher density, suitable for a town centre location, could be possible at Bramlands. However, this does not at this stage set out the number of storeys that might be proposed as part of this.”

Previous planning guidelines have indicated that new building height should be kept at around five or six storeys – the hotel development opposite CJ station was cut from 16 storeys to eight. But there is no longer ambiguity about the height of the new proposed towers. A council official at the exhibition admitted that they would be about the same height as the remaining towers – around 26 storeys.

When it was pointed out that the Junction area was mostly a human-sized, largely Victorian five storeys or so, and that the local people had decisively rejected the plan for the Junction towers – “Oh, you mean the 42-storey ones” – the official said: “Well, the mayor of London has a different policy now.”
Apparently Network Rail plans to buy the Grant Road railway arches and develop them as chic restaurants, delis etc. The image on Page 4 of the latest Brightside appears to show this with what may possibly be the back of one of the proposed towers.

New towers at Clapham Junction to cater for developments at Nine Elms

There was a suggestion during the exhibition that the council has a specific policy to develop this area as a “hub” with a “buzz” to cater for increased traffic from the Nine Elms development and the forthcoming Battersea Power Station Tube station. An official said that the first four floors or so of the towers would be commercial and above that one tower might “possibly be a hotel”. There might also, apparently, be interest from a dance company looking for studios. The towers would have to be tall to be financially attractive.

The site is at present occupied by a bus terminal, a church, an old people’s home and a pub, the Peacock, currently being renovated. “I don’t really know why they’re doing that,” said an official. “We’d have to buy it and demolish it.” The council, it seems, already owns the old people’s home, so would have to build a new one (at what cost?) elsewhere.

So the Bramlands plan is nothing to do with rehousing the estate residents. Nor has it been asked for by them. Indeed it will involve compulsory purchase of the pub, and possibly the church, and rehoming the old folk. Plus finding other space for the buses.

It appears to be simply a cynical attempt by the council to piggy-back on the universally accepted necessity to regenerate the Winstanley and York Road estates. It is not (at least officially) developers proposing to build towers and having to go through a long planning procedure. It is the council, like a cat lying on its back so its tummy can be tickled, rolling over for developers. It would be unsurprising if (as was apparently the case with the 42-storey CJ monsters) the council has already been “talking to people” who are just waiting for it to green light the regeneration scheme before whacking in their plans for those tempting towers. And do you think the council will turn them down? Especially when they promise some few million in sweeteners to help repave Wandsworth or whatever.

The Council refuse to extend the publicity for his tower plans

It is likely that a lot of estate residents did not see the exhibition, which ran for only three days with hours that meant many people would have been away at work. And in spite of our earlier request, the council did not extend the publicity for the exhibition to a wider area round Clapham Junction south of the railway bridge. A longer run with better publicity in Clapham Junction station, on St John’s Road and in the libraries would have given those who live and/or work in an area they care about and who would not be able to avoid the proposed towers, the chance to see the proposals and express their views. The image used in Brightside cannily shows only a couple of floors of the new building. Thus the council considers the Bramlands area adjacent to the railway bridge not part of the Clapham Junction wider area for consultation purposes but very much, as its planning team said in 2013, a “town centre location” for “development to a higher density”.

On this basis, the Clapham Junction Action Group would like to be involved in the redevelopment discussions. Therefore we have requested a meeting with the project team to discuss the plans.

Be prepared for a cluster of “Falcon Towers” at Clapham Junction

Proposed cluster of towers near the railway bridge

 

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Be prepared for a cluster of “Falcon Towers” at Clapham Junction

Winstanley/York redevelopment exhibition

An update exhibition for the regeneration of the Winstanley and York Road estates will take place at York Gardens Library at the following dates:

  • 3pm – 8pm, Wednesday 19 November
  • ​2pm – 5pm, Thursday 20 November
  • 10am -1pm, Friday 21 November

The exhibition will include:

  • Inkster and Penge refurbishment plans
  • Update on development at Bramlands
  • Results of tenants housing needs survey
  • Update on preferred option
  • Development along Grant Road
  • Winstanley Estate public realm improvement
  • York Gardens and community facilities

A team will be there to answer questions. Including:

  • Philip Morris, Winstanley and York Road Regeneration Project Manager
  • Charlotte Haley, Winstanley and York Road Regeneration Project Officer

>>> See our previous article in our Winstanley/York Road redevelopment dossier.

Winstanley/York redevelopment exhibition

We are currently distributing leaflets. If you can help us to distribute in your area, please contact us.

 

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Winstanley/York redevelopment exhibition

Council’s plan for a Cluster of High Towers

The Clapham Junction Action Group is currently distributing leaflets in the area to warn about the Council’s plan for a Cluster of High Towers beside Clapham Junction station.

Related articles:

You can download our leaflet HERE and see it below.

>> If you can help us to distribute in your area, please contact us.

Council’s plan for a Cluster of High Towers

Council’s plan for a Cluster of High Towers

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Council’s plan for a Cluster of High Towers

Winstanley and York Road estates regeneration: Council prepared to evict Ganley Court

Author: Cyril Richert

Winstanley and York Road estates regeneration: Council prepared to evict Ganley Court

Preferred Option = Option 3A

The Council is prepared to proceed from Right to Buy sales to move forward their Winstanley and York redevelopment plans, we have learned from an article published in the Wandsworth Guardian.

It is a direct threat to the residents of Ganley Court, who have opposed the plans to demolish their low rise homes facing York Gardens.

The article says that the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, has defined the area as his first ‘housing zones’ earmarked for regenerationthe, and that Greater London Authority, Transport for London and Network Rail will prioritise the area, working with Wandsworth Council.

Ravi Govindia, leader of Wandsworth Council, said:

“We cannot absorb costs beyond our control.

There may also be opportunities to share risk, develop flexible tenures to meet local needs, access funding to support infrastructure improvements and offer greater freedoms over how the project is financed.

This could include using the proceeds from Right to Buy sales to invest in new homes.”

The “preferred-option”, labelled as Option 3A and presented by the Council’s team, involves a greater level of change including replacing some existing housing blocks with modern ‘courtyard developments’ built around a traditional street layout. According to the plan the overall size of York Garden will not decrease but will be surrounded by buildings.

On the side of the “regeneration area” they are planning more tower blocks up to 25 storeys near Falcon bridge.

Winstanley and York Road estates regeneration: Council prepared to evict Ganley Court

Ganley Court residents oppose demolition of their homes

As you can see in our previous article, the majority on non council tenants Winstanley residents oppose the full demolition.

Winstanley and York Road estates regeneration: Council prepared to evict Ganley Court

Ganley Court

According to early plans, Council tenants will be offered an alternative home on a social rent within the new development or in the local area. Resident leaseholders and freeholders will be offered the market value of your property, plus 10% (or 7.5% if they are not residents).

However, if you take the example of Ganley Court, the owners of houses who could be offered about £300k for their properties, will not be able to buy any 2/3 bedroom house/flat for that amount in the area (a 2 bed-flat example here for sale at £725k) and would have to leave Clapham Junction or forced to take on additional mortgage. As one resident said, being ill and 70 year old make it impossible for him to get a mortgage.

The words reported by the Wandsworth Guardian show that the Council is now prepared to force their plan and eradicate to opposition to their drastic change.

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Winstanley and York Road estates regeneration: Council prepared to evict Ganley Court

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

Author: Cyril Richert

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

Exhibitions at York Gardens Library on Saturday, 8 February 2014

Following the 2013 masterplan options consultation a ‘preferred option’ has now been presented to the local community: the full demolition / redevelopment of the estates is the chosen scheme, which received the greatest level of local support according to the Council’s team.You can view the preferred option exhibition boards on the council’s website as well as a summary booklet which is being sent to every home on the estates.

57% in favour of full demolition, but…

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

According to the Winstanley-York regeneration team, 70% voted for option 2 or 3 (with 57% preferred option 3 meaning full redevelopment of both estates). Although the team promised us a break-down of the figures back last autumn, there was nothing as such in the preferred-option exhibition.

Never-mind, we worked out the figures working on the Appendix from Council paper 14-158 with the full consultation results.

As we wrote in a previous article the 57% approval does not reflect the great divide between Council tenants who have been promised a relocation in the new redeveloped estate, and the freeholders /leaseholder /private tenants who will be likely to have to leave the whole area of Clapham Junction definitely.

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

The support for option 3 depends highly on who has been surveyed: York Road resident or Winstanley resident? Council tenant or private owner?

UPDATE: The council said in its press release that it has made a commitment that every council tenant and resident leaseholder who needs to move out of the old buildings would be offered a new home on the estate or close by.

Full redevelopment on Winstanley-York estates

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

Preferred Option = Option 3A

The “preferred-option”, labelled as Option 3A and presented by the team, involves a greater level of change including replacing some existing housing blocks with modern ‘courtyard developments’ built around a traditional street layout. Some other housing blocks would be refurbished (although we could not see which and how many).

Option 3A also includes new development along the edge of York road which would provide a new library, health and leisure centre (only to replace the planned removal of the Battersea Sport Centre), a new community centre with homes above. According to the plan the overall size of York Garden will not decrease but will be surrounded by buildings.

More tall buildings near Falcon bridge

As the Council claim to put consultation at the heart of their masterplan, have we been consulted on the plan for the site closer to Falcon bridge which will be highly visible from both sides of the railway?

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

What they call “Bramlands” is the new developments along Grant Road and the new “station piazza” near Falcon Bridge, which is currently designed with a series of buildings the same height or taller than the current Falcon Towers.

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

Grant Road redevelopment (and area beside Falcon Bridge) as displayed in the brochure of the preferred option

As the Clapham Junction Action Group raised the issue in November 15th, 2013, it looks like again that all inputs from the community is being totally ignored (we were told: “don’t worry, this is just a masterplan“).

What next?

During 2014 the preferred option will be developed from an outline proposal into a more detailed masterplan.

The next major public consultation will take place in late 2014 when a more detailed design and delivery plan will be presented to the local community.

Eventually the new buildings could be delivered from 2018.

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

The expected time frame

The scheme should be delivered in phases, with the first one being… the one that they haven’t properly consulted on: Grant Road-Falcon Bridge!

Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

If you want to let them know your views, please write to:
winstanleyyorkroad@wandsworth.go.uk
Tel: 020 8871 6802

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Full demolition for Winstanley and York estates as the chosen option

Winstanley and York Redevelopment: proposal revealed next week

Author: Cyril Richert

Winstanley and York Redevelopment: proposal revealed next week

York Road Estate

The ‘preferred option’ for improving the Winstanley and York Road estates will be on display at York Gardens Library in early February. The exhibitions will present the development option which received the greatest level of local support and will show how residents’ feedback has been used to develop the design.

The exhibitions will be at York Gardens Library on:

  • Saturday, 8 February: 12pm to 3pm
  • Monday, 10 February: 5pm to 8pm
  • Wednesday, 12 February: 10am to 1pm

During October and November 2013, the Council has presented four different improvement proposals for the Winstanley and York Road estates and asked for views on their relative pros and cons.

Some issues on the consultation responses

Without knowing what will be the preferred option displayed next week, we know that the council wrote that “exhibitions will present the development option which received the greatest level of local support“. On the exhibition on 23rd November 2013, they showed that Option 3 (greater change) was supported by 56% of respondents (15% for option 2, 13% for option 1 and 125 for only refurbishment).

However it does not reflect properly the level of support for each part of the plan (Winstanley estate/York Estate/Near the station). Latchmere ward councillor Simon Hogg pointed out a series of issues in his blog (quotes in italic):

  1. Council “tenants are more in favour of the plans than leaseholders, as they are guaranteed a new flat in the local area.”
  2. Most of the votes for widespread demolition come from council tenants in the York Road estate slab blocks.
  3. Homeowners may feel the system is unfair if the votes of tenants in a block 200 metres away leads to the demolition of their house.
  4. Leaseholders are offered the value of their property plus 10%“.  However with a 1 bedroom flat reaching £400k in Clapham Junction, it certainly mean that they will have to live somewhere else if they want to buy a new home.
  5. There are some residents in Ganley Court who are dead-set against the regeneration. Indeed even if you give them what their three bedroom house with a garden five minutes from Clapham Junction is now worth, they simply won’t be able to buy another similar property in the area“.

Station piazza, amount offered to home owners, level of social housing… those are some issues that the plan needs to address

Is station piazza plan considered for tall buildings?

Winstanley and York Redevelopment: proposal revealed next week

Although the Council focuses currently solely on the residents of the Winstanley and York estates, their plan includes for each option the same redevelopment of the area near Falcon bridge. And no notice of consultation has been sent to residents living outside of the estates.

We have been discussing with the project team during a session at the York Library and have expressed our worries that – although we understand that this is a series of draft proposal – architects are in the view that more towers are suitable in Clapham Junction Town Centre.

Again, local residents that have continuously expressed their dislike of tall buildings around Clapham Junction seem to be ignored.

Amount offered to home owners is not enough to relocate in the area

Council tenants will be offered an alternative home on a social rent within the new development or in the local area. Resident leaseholders and freeholders will be offered the market value of your property, plus 10% (or 7.5% if they are not residents). More information on this page.

However, if you take the example of Ganley Court, the owners of houses who could be offered about £300k for their properties, will not be able to buy any 2/3 bedroom house/flat for that amount in the area (a 2 bed-flat example here for sale at £725k) and would have to leave Clapham Junction or forced to take on additional mortgage. As one resident said, being ill and 70 year old make it impossible for him to get a mortgage.

Winstanley and York Redevelopment: proposal revealed next week

Everyone should be entitled to a fair deal. If they have to leave their property in order to allow the redevelopment, they should be able to be able to reallocate nearby. with a similar standard of living. The much needed estate regeneration shouldn’t be made at the expense of the private owners who have lived in the community for a while.

What will be the level of social houses when finished?

Another concern is the level of social housing that will be allocated to the redevelopment. At the moment, the council has got about 700 social dwellings which are proposed to be demolished. With the developers planning to build up to 2000 units, what will be the final quota?

If the developers stick to the 30% level of affordable accommodation, they do not need to provide a single extra social unit after redevelopment. While Wandsworth is desperately needing more social homes, is it the solution in favour by the Council?

What community infrastructure?

A new leisure centre is planned within the redevelopment. However we have been told that at the same time, the current leisure centre located the other side of Plough road could be demolished and redeveloped as residential.

If this is the case, the other leisure centre should be included in the economic viability calculation of the overall plan.

We need to have all those concerns in mind when we go to visit the exhibition and talk to the team in charge of the redevelopment plan.

Filed under: Winstanley&York Road Winstanley and York Redevelopment: proposal revealed next week